Reengineering Resource Center: Templates and Case Studies

 Home   Reengineering Resource Center

Templates

How do you map business processes?
For each area listed, The Lab's templates provide:
  • Business process definition
  • BPM tools
  • Workflow surveys
  • Value stream maps
  • Workflow analysis
  • Benchmarking tools
  • Lean Six Sigma tools
  • Lean improvements and benefits
Contact The Lab for more information.

Case Studies

The Lab's case studies and project profiles provide detailed descriptions of the non-technology improvement projects we have implemented with our clients. Search the organizations and industries highlighted below to review the quantified results we have delivered for our clients. Contact Us for even more information.
Contact The Lab for more Templates and Case Studies

Organization-based Case Studies

 

Industry-based Case Studies

Support Groups
 
Line Groups
Supply Chain Operations
 
Services
 
Supply Chain
Line Groups: Supply Chain Operations - Production Study
Line Groups: Supply Chain Operations - Production Case Study
 
Case Study 2 of 2
Previous
 
Consumer Packaged Goods

 



Branded Foods
North America

 



Project Sponsor:
Senior Vice President

Project Descriptions:
  • Self-funding, non-technology manufacturing operations improvement initiative for a branded foods business line within the North American network. Objectives: Improve service; reduce costs; simplify processes for new ERP technology
  • Scope of project:
    • Production planning
    • Inbound materials
    • Raw materials processing
    • Packing/fill line
    • Quality assurance
    • Finished goods inventory
  • Improvement benefits:
    • Operating cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .↓11%
    • Annual savings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$5.5M
    • Headcount . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ↓8%
    • Break even point . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5mos.
    • ROI [12 month] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.0x
    • Unplanned downtime . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .↓22%
    • Machine turn rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .↑80%
    • On-time customer delivery . . . . . . . . . . .↑98%
Production Operations

Situation Analysis: ClientCo, is the North American division of a global $10B diversified foods producer. Brands include numerous household products and foods.

Senior management sought operations improvement as new technology [an ERP system] was being deployed. The effort focused on bulk products sold to other producers, as well as branded and private label consumer products sold to national grocery chains.

Improvements Identified: The Phase I effort [eight weeks] analyzed all aspects of manufacturing production operations from planning and scheduling through finished goods inventory. Over 175 non-technology improvements were identified and incorporated into a five-month, self-funding implementation work plan, coordinated with the ERP deployment schedule. Examples:

  1. Filler Line Issues - Approximately 30-40 near term, non-technology improvements depressed machine performance by at least 30% on average from conservatively established targets. Examples: Inconsistent vendor performance created deformities in bottles creating jams, off-spec production. Employees failed to properly adjust conveyor rails for container size variations; understaffing and poor performance measures in front end staging created downtime; delays; improper cleaning of filler mechanism resulted in excessive air in bottles/underfills.
  2. Production/Cost Standards - Extensive investment was directed toward updating standard labor, cost and productivity data. However, minimal effort was made to uncover the root causes of productivity gains/losses. No data on customer priorities or competitive capabilities [e.g., lead times, packaging options] was included. Standards maintenance efforts were primarily focused on the needs of the finance and accounting organization.
  3. Minor Maintenance/Housekeeping - Underinvestment in low cost maintenance equipment and root cause documentation [see 2, above]. Example: purchase of a heavy duty vacuum cleaner [$150] dedicated to the capping machine reduced over-torque of bottle caps [product destruction] from 14% to less than 1% within three days of implementation.
  4. Packaging Inventory Discipline - Discipline—Failure to promptly update packaging inventory, destroy expired supplies [e.g., adhesives] and outdated materials [e.g., caps, labels] created packaging error rates twice those of comparable peers.

Overall Results: After the Phase I effort, The Lab worked with ClientCo internal teams to implement the self-funding non-technology improvements and coordinate streamlined business processes with the new ERP technology.

Home | About The Lab | FAQ's | Projects | Clients | Contact
The Lab | 201.526.1200