Process Improvements With Measurable Results

See Our Results Below: Select an organization or industry based area below to view the related case study. 

Organization Based

Broadly applicable to many companies and industries.

Support Groups:

Line Groups:

Supply Chain Operations:

Industry Based

Document operations which are unique to particular business segments and industries.

Services:

Supply Chain:

Loading... Please wait
Loading Bar

Food Production/Processing

Download

Consumer Packaged Goods: Production Operations

North America

Project Descriptions:

Self-funding, non-technology manufacturing operations improvement initiative for a branded foods business line within the North American network. Objectives: Improve service; reduce costs; simplify processes for new ERP technology

Scope of Project:

  • Production planning
  • Inbound materials
  • Raw materials processing
  • Packaging/fill line
  • Quality assurance
  • Finished goods inventory

Improvement Benefits:

  • Operating cost 11%
  • Annual savings $5.5M
  • Head count 8%
  • Break even point 5 mos.
  • ROI (12 month) 4.0x
  • Unplanned downtime22%
  • Machine turn rate80%
  • On-time customer delivery98%

Situation Analysis:

ClientCo, is the North American division of a global $10B diversified foods producer. Brands include numerous household products and foods. Senior management sought operations improvement as new technology [an ERP system] was being deployed. The effort focused on bulk products sold to other producers, as well as branded and private label consumer products sold to national grocery chains.

Improvements Identified:

The Phase I effort [eight weeks] analyzed all aspects of manufacturing production operations from planning and scheduling through finished goods inventory. Over 175 non-technology improvements were identified and incorporated into a five-month, self-funding implementation work plan, coordinated with the ERP deployment schedule. Examples:

  1. Filler Line Issues - Approximately 30-40 near term, non-technology improvements depressed machine performance by at least 30% on average from conservatively established targets. Examples: Inconsistent vendor performance created deformities in bottles creating jams, off-spec production. Employees failed to properly adjust conveyor rails for container size variations; understaffing and poor performance measures in front end staging created downtime; delays; improper cleaning of filler mechanism resulted in excessive air in bottles/underfills.
  2. Production/Costs Standards - Extensive investment was directed toward updating standard labor, cost and productivity data. However, minimal effort was made to uncover the root causes of productivity gains/losses. No data on customer priorities or competitive capabilities [e.g., lead times, packaging options] was included. Standards maintenance efforts were primarily focused on the needs of the finance and accounting organization.
  3. Minor Maintenance/Housekeeping - Underinvestment in low cost maintenance equipment and root cause documentation [see 2, above]. Example: purchase of a heavy duty vacuum cleaner [$150] dedicated to the capping machine reduced over-torque of bottle caps [product destruction] from 14% to less than 1% within three days of implementation.
  4. Packaging Inventory Discipline - Failure to promptly update packaging inventory, destroy expired supplies [e.g., adhesives] and outdated materials [e.g., caps, labels] created packaging error rates twice those of comparable peers.

Overall Results:

After the Phase I effort, The Lab worked with ClientCo internal teams to implement the self-funding non-technology improvements and coordinate streamlined business processes with the new ERP technology.